《离骚草木疏》是2004年北京图书馆出版社出版的图书，作者是[宋]吴仁杰。
此书为吴仁杰为二十五篇《离骚》作疏。吴仁杰，字斗南。曾任国子学录。此疏多以山海经为据，征引宏富，考辩典核，可补王逸训诂《离骚》不足之处。
宋庆元六年罗田县庠刻本
宋吴仁杰撰。仁杰有《古周易》，已著录。是编末有仁杰庆元丁巳自序，谓梁刘杳有《草木疏》二卷，见於本传。其书已亡。杳疏凡王逸所集者皆在焉，仁杰独取二十五篇疏之。其大旨谓《离骚》之文，多本《山海经》，故书中引用，每以《山海经》为断。若辨“夕揽洲之宿莽”句，引《朝歌》之“山有莽草焉”为据，驳王逸旧注之非。其说甚辨。然骚人寄兴，义不一端。琼枝、若木之属，固有寓言；澧兰、沅芷之类，亦多即目。必举其随时抒望，触物兴怀，悉引之於大荒之外，使灵均所赋，悉出伯益所书，是泽畔行吟，主於侈其博赡，非以写其哀怨，是亦好奇之过矣。以其徵引宏富，考辨典核，实能补王逸训诂所未及。以视陆玑之疏《毛诗》、罗愿之翼《尔雅》，可以方轨并驾，争骛后先，故博物者恒资焉。迹其赅洽，固亦考证之林也。此本为影宋旧钞，末有庆元庚申方灿跋。又有校正姓氏三行。盖仁杰官国子学录时，属灿刊於罗田者。旧版散佚，流传颇罕。写本仅存，亦可谓艺林之珍笈矣。
四卷（浙江范懋柱家天一阁藏本）
明屠本畯撰。本畯有《闽中海错疏》，已著录。是书以宋吴仁杰《离骚草木疏》多有未备，特於“香草”类增入麻、秬、黍、薇、藻、稻、粢、麦、梁八种，於“嘉木”类增入枫、梧二种。其馀於仁杰疏多所删汰。自谓明简过之，而实则反失之疏略。又每类冠以《离骚》本文及王逸《注》，拟於诗之《小序》，亦无关宏旨，徒事更张。至仁杰谓宿莽非卷葹，斥王逸《注》及郭璞《尔雅注》之误。本畯是书，引罗愿《尔雅翼》以明之。不知其引《南越志》“宁乡草名卷葹，江淮间谓之宿莽”者，正主郭之说。不免自相剌谬，尤失於考证矣。
Li Sao Cao Mu Shu “is a book published by Beijing Library Press in 2004, authored by Wu Renjie of the Song Dynasty.

This book is a commentary by Wu Renjie on 25 chapters of ‘Li Sao’. Wu Renjie, also known as Dounan. Formerly served as a student record of Guozi. This commentary is mostly based on the Shan Hai Jing, citing Hongfu and verifying the argumentation code, which can supplement the shortcomings of Wang Yi’s exegesis of “Li Sao”.

Song Qingyuan 6th year Luotian County Xiang engraved edition

Written by Renjie of Song and Wu. Renjie has the “Ancient Book of Changes”, which has been recorded. At the end of the compilation, there is a preface by Renjie Qingyuan Dingsi, which states that Liang and Liu Yaoyou have two volumes of ‘Grass and Wood Shuo’, which can be found in this biography. His book is dead. Where are all the collections of Wang Yi in the imperial examination? Renjie alone collected 25 articles. Its main purpose is the text of “Li Sao”, with multiple copies of “The Classic of Mountains and Seas”. Therefore, in the book, the “Classic of Mountains and Seas” is used as a reference. If we discern the sentence “Xi Lan Zhou Su Mang” and cite the “Mountain with Mang Cao Yan” in the “Chao Ge” as the basis, refute Wang Yi’s old annotations. His statement is very discerning. Although the poet expresses his interest, righteousness does not end. The genus of Qiongzhi and Ruowu is an inherent fable; Lilan, Yuanzhi, and other similar plants are also commonly seen. It is necessary to express one’s expectations at any time, touch upon things and arouse one’s emotions, and understand that it is beyond the great wilderness, bestowed by the spiritual capital, and written by Bo Yi. It is a wandering chant by the banks of the river, and the main purpose is to waste one’s abundant support, not to write about one’s sorrows, but also to be curious. By citing great wealth and examining the core of the classics, it can indeed supplement what Wang Yixun did not achieve. By observing Lu Jizhi’s sparse “Mao Shi” and Luo Yuanzhi’s wing “Er Ya”, we can keep abreast of each other’s tracks and strive for excellence. Therefore, those who possess natural resources are highly valued. The trace is comprehensive and consistent, and it is also a forest of textual research. This was originally an old banknote from the Shadow Song Dynasty, but at the end there was a Qingyuan Gengshen Fang Canba. There are three lines for correcting surnames. When Gai Renjie was recording his official studies, he belonged to the category of Can published in Luotian. The old version has been scattered and lost, and it is rarely circulated. The only surviving manuscript can be considered a precious collection of art.

Four Volumes (Zhejiang Fan Maozhu Family Tianyi Pavilion Collection)

Written by Ming Tu Benxi. There is a book titled ‘Misinterpretation of the Central Fujian Sea’ in this section, which has been recorded. The book “Li Sao Cao Mu Shu” by Wu Renjie of Song Dynasty has many unprepared works, specifically adding eight types of herbs to the “vanilla” category, including hemp, millet, millet, wei, algae, rice, wheat, and Liang, and two types of maple and wu to the “Jiamu” category. The rest were deleted by Renjie Shuduo. It is said that it is too simplistic in nature, but in reality, it is actually lacking in simplicity. Each category is also titled “Li Sao” in this article and Wang Yi’s “Annotations”, which are intended to be included in the “Preface” of the poem. They are also irrelevant and require a change of focus. Zhiren Jie referred to Su Mang as not a scroll writer, criticizing Wang Yi’s “Annotations” and Guo Pu’s “Erya Annotations” for their errors. This is a book, citing Luo’s wish to clarify it in the “Er Ya Yi”. I don’t know if it refers to the “Ningxiang Grass Name Volume” in the “Annals of Nanyue”, which refers to the “Su Mang” in the Jianghuai region. It is said by the main official Guo Zhi. It is inevitable to contradict each other, especially in terms of textual research.

历史上的今天 ( 27 )：